---

NiteCap Controversy: The Silk Hair Bonnet Backlash Explained

In recent days, a controversy has ignited in the world of fashion and beauty, centered around designer Sarah Marantz Lindenberg and her collection of $75 silk hair bonnets under the brand name NiteCap. The uproar began when Marantz Lindenberg shared the inspiration behind her product line in an interview with Fashion Magazine.

In the interview, Marantz Lindenberg revealed that her journey into creating NiteCap started when she was planning her wedding. She had been dealing with skin breakouts on her face, neck, and back, and a dermatologist suggested she sleep with her hair pulled back. While silk scarves provided some relief, they didn’t quite meet her needs. Thus, the concept of NiteCap was born.

However, it wasn’t long after the interview was published that consumers took to social media to voice their concerns. Many pointed out that NiteCap was far from being the first product of its kind. Marantz Lindenberg did acknowledge the existence of other similar products and the age-old practice of hair wrapping, but she failed to recognize the historical context. Social media users were quick to highlight that hair bonnets and wraps have a deep-rooted history in black hair culture.

Many accused NiteCap of cultural appropriation, a term used when elements of one culture are adopted or borrowed by individuals from another culture, often without proper acknowledgment or respect for the origin. Commenters were also quick to criticize the high price tag of NiteCap, given the availability of similar products at a fraction of the cost. Marantz Lindenberg defended the price, citing the use of 100% natural silk and sustainable production practices, but some pointed to alternatives like the Slap (Satin-Lined Cap) by Grace Eleyae, which was available for less than $50.

Tia Tyree, a communications and culture professor at Howard University, highlighted that the benefits of hair wraps have been known for generations in the African American community. She expressed her disappointment with the marketing of NiteCap as if it were a new concept when it’s been a part of black culture for decades.

In response to the growing criticism, Marantz Lindenberg took to Instagram to address the concerns. In a statement to TODAY Style, she clarified her intentions: “Hair wrapping and sleep bonnets have been used for centuries, and I have never once claimed to have invented or come up with the concept, despite many stories and posts misquoting me.” She emphasized that she introduced her version of the product because she couldn’t find one that met her specific needs and aligned with her values of local, sustainable, and natural materials.

Regarding the price point, Marantz Lindenberg explained, “The actual price of a NiteCap is $75 USD (the website is listed in Canadian dollars). The price point is such because it is made from 2 yards of 100% natural silk and creates minimal waste through a sustainable production process locally in Canada. We are also committed to supporting fair pay, worker safety and employ a female-owned and operated manufacturing facility.”

She also expressed her willingness to listen to consumers’ concerns: “I’ve heard the voices and concerns over the last few days. Moving forward, I aim to take some time to determine how best to honor this tradition.”

The NiteCap controversy serves as a reminder of the importance of cultural sensitivity and the need for thoughtful consideration when introducing products inspired by cultural practices. It also underscores the power of social media in amplifying voices and holding brands accountable for their actions.

As this debate continues, it will be interesting to see how Sarah Marantz Lindenberg and NiteCap navigate the delicate balance between innovation, cultural appreciation, and respect for tradition in the world of beauty and fashion.